Hearing screening follow-up return rate in a very low birth weight project: A retrospective record review

Amisha Kanji, Katijah Khoza-Shangase, Daynia Ballot


Objectives. To determine the follow-up return rate for a hearing screening programme implemented as part of a very low birth weight project (VLBWP).
Design. This was a retrospective, passive archival design. Data were collected from the VLBWP records and participant files from the Department of Audiology, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.
Setting. Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, South Africa, a public sector hospital.
Subjects. Eighty-six participants were included for retrospective analysis, consisting of 35 males and 51 females with a birth weight range of 680 - 1 500 g.
Outcome measures. Return rate for all neonates referred for follow-up oto-acoustic emissions screening.
Results. Of the 86 neonates who were referred for a follow-up screening, only 31.4% (27) returned for a repeat outpatient hearing screening appointment.
Conclusions. The follow-up return rate is significantly poor and may influence implementation of early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI). Efforts to improve the return rate should be intensified. These may involve parental education and counselling, as well as involvement of nursing staff and medical professionals in implementation of EHDI programmes. It may be possible to improve follow-up by aligning follow-up screening with the day of neonatal follow-up clinics in provincial hospitals where such services are available, including it in such clinics, or ensuring follow-up screening at immunisation clinics closer to where patients live.

Authors' affiliations

Amisha Kanji, Department of Speech Therapy and Audiology, University of the Witwatersrand

Katijah Khoza-Shangase, Department of Speech Therapy and Audiology, University of the Wiwatersrand

Daynia Ballot, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of the Witwatersrand

Full Text

PDF (1553KB)


follow-up; early;hearing; intervention;low birth weight; screening

Cite this article

South African Journal of Child Health 2010;4(4):95.

Article History

Date submitted: 2010-07-21
Date published: 2010-12-08

Article Views

Abstract views: 4930
Full text views: 1916

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here